Decoding Options Futures and Other Derivatives Platform Survey
A seemingly simple poll posted on Quantlabs' YouTube community tab has sparked a quiet, yet intriguing, discussion. The question was direct: "What platform would you only for futures and options of futures for market data and order execution only? Please comment your good and bad on each." The options were: Rithmic API only, IBKR only, and Sierra Chart with their own Denali feed and Teton order routing. What's striking is the result: zero percent for each option. This begs the question: what does this unanimous lack of enthusiasm signify? This helps which technology to use for Options Futures and Other Derivatives asset classes.
To understand this, we need to delve deeper into each platform, considering their strengths and weaknesses in the context of futures and options trading, and then analyze why the Quantlabs audience might have abstained from voting.
1. Rithmic API Only: The Speed Demon with Development Demands
Rithmic is renowned for its speed and low latency, making it a favorite among high-frequency traders and those seeking to exploit fleeting market opportunities. Its API is highly regarded for its robust functionality, allowing developers to build custom trading applications.
The Good:
Ultra-Low Latency: Rithmic's infrastructure is designed for speed, crucial for capturing rapid price movements in futures and options markets.
Robust API: The API provides extensive access to market data and order execution, enabling sophisticated trading strategies.
Direct Market Access (DMA): Rithmic facilitates DMA, allowing traders to bypass intermediaries and interact directly with exchanges, minimizing slippage.
Specialized for Futures: Rithmic is heavily focused on futures markets, making it a strong contender for traders specializing in this asset class.
See my video short here
Fill out the survey here:
The Bad:
API-Centric: Relying solely on the Rithmic API necessitates significant programming expertise. This barrier to entry can deter non-programmers.
Lack of User Interface: Rithmic itself doesn't offer a traditional trading platform. Users must build their own or rely on third-party platforms that integrate with the API.
Cost: Rithmic's data and API access can be relatively expensive, particularly for individual traders.
Complexity: Building and maintaining a custom trading system based on an API can be complex and time-consuming.
Why the Zero? The 0% vote for "Rithmic API only" likely reflects the platform's inherent complexity. Many retail traders, even those interested in algorithmic trading, may lack the necessary programming skills to fully utilize the API. The cost and development time required may also be deterrents.
2. IBKR Only: The Versatile Broker with Potential Trade-offs
Interactive Brokers (IBKR) is a global brokerage firm offering access to a wide range of markets, including futures and options. Its Trader Workstation (TWS) platform is feature-rich, providing a comprehensive trading experience.
The Good:
Broad Market Access: IBKR provides access to a vast array of global markets, including futures and options exchanges worldwide.
Feature-Rich Platform (TWS): TWS offers a plethora of tools and features, including advanced charting, order types, and risk management tools.
Competitive Commissions: IBKR is known for its competitive commission rates, making it attractive to cost-conscious traders.
API Availability: IBKR also offers an API, allowing for algorithmic trading and custom application development.
The Bad:
Potential Latency Issues: While IBKR offers fast execution, it may not match the ultra-low latency of specialized platforms like Rithmic.
TWS Complexity: TWS can be overwhelming for novice traders due to its extensive features and complex interface.
Customer Service: Some users have reported challenges with IBKR's customer service.
API Learning Curve: While available, the IBKR API can have a steep learning curve.
Focus on broad markets: IBKR's focus isn't solely on futures and options, so specialized platforms might be better for those who trade only futures and options.
Why the Zero? While IBKR is a popular choice, its potential latency issues and the complexity of TWS might deter serious futures and options traders seeking the absolute best performance. The "IBKR only" option also excludes the usage of any other platform, which is limiting.
3. Sierra Chart with Denali Feed and Teton Order Routing: The Charting Powerhouse
Sierra Chart is a professional charting and trading platform known for its advanced technical analysis capabilities and highly customizable features. The Denali feed and Teton order routing are designed to provide fast and reliable market data and order execution.
The Good:
Advanced Charting: Sierra Chart offers a wide range of technical analysis tools and indicators, making it a powerful platform for chart-based trading.
Customization: The platform is highly customizable, allowing traders to tailor it to their specific needs.
Denali Feed: The Denali feed provides fast and reliable market data, crucial for accurate analysis and timely execution.
Teton Order Routing: Teton order routing is designed for fast and efficient order execution.
Relatively low cost for the features provided.
The Bad:
Steep Learning Curve: Sierra Chart's extensive features and customizable interface can be daunting for new users.
Dated Interface: The platform's interface may appear dated compared to modern trading platforms.
Configuration Complexity: The platform requires significant configuration and customization to optimize its performance.
Specific Focus: Sierra Chart is very focused on technical analysis and futures/options trading, it is not a broad multi asset platform.
Why the Zero? While Sierra Chart is a strong contender for serious technical traders, its steep learning curve and dated interface might deter some users. The requirement to use "only" Sierra Chart without any other possible complement, might be too limiting.
Decoding the Zeroes: The Quantlabs Audience and the Quest for Perfection
The unanimous 0% vote across all options likely reflects the Quantlabs audience's specific needs and expectations. This audience, often composed of algorithmic traders and developers, seeks the perfect balance of speed, flexibility, and control.
The Pursuit of Customization: Many in the Quantlabs community prefer to build their own trading systems or customize existing platforms to suit their specific strategies. Limiting them to a single platform, even a powerful one, is restrictive.
The Importance of Speed and Reliability: Futures and options trading demand fast and reliable market data and order execution. Any perceived latency or instability can be a deal-breaker.
The Desire for Flexibility: Traders want the ability to combine different platforms and tools to create the optimal trading environment. Restricting them to a single option limits their flexibility.
The high standards of the audience: The audience is very technically knowledgeable and expects the best of the best. Many are looking for a combination of the listed platforms.
Conclusion:
The Quantlabs survey reveals the complex and nuanced demands of serious futures and options traders. No single platform perfectly meets the needs of every trader, and the pursuit of the ideal trading environment often involves a combination of tools and technologies. The 0% vote is not a condemnation of the listed platforms, but rather a testament to the high standards and diverse needs of the Quantlabs audience, who seek the perfect blend of performance, customization, and flexibility. The poll results highlight the fact that many seek a combination of those platforms, or other platforms, to create the best trading environment.
Comentários